Q This course has a Final Project which is in the form of a PowerPoint presentation. You can choose a topic from this semester or something you come up with yourself, but your presentation must be about Management and be original (ie not just material verbatim that you have pulled from your text/readings or off the internet). Of course, you can still insert charts, graphs, videos, graphics and excerpts from outside sources (as long as you cite those sources!) I want to see your commentary and analysis, in your own words. IMPORTANT: Copying the work of others and representing it as your own (ex. copy and paste off of the internet or your text, OR using someone else's work and just changing a few words) is Plagiarism, a serious academic offense. I have enabled the Turnitin plagiarism checker for this assignment, to help you identify potential areas of plagiarism. Papers that are substantially plagiarized will NOT be accepted for grading. Although the format is a Power Point, I want to emphasize that this is NOT like your typical Power Point, which is basically an outline for a live presentation. Your project must be substantially loaded with content. You can do this either on the slides themselves, or you can add voice-over to simulate a live presentation. The first slide should be your Introduction slide, the next 10-15 slides should be informational slides, the last slide should be the reference slide. PLEASE contact me if you have any questions about the requirements of this project, plagiarism, citations...or any other concerns! Rubric Rubric: Final Project Presentation Rubric: Final Project Presentation Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction Introduces the subject of the presentation, indicating why it is important and previewing the key course points. 5 to >3.0 pts Excellent/Good Fulfills all/most criterion 3 to >1.0 pts Satisfactory/Needs Improvement Introduction included, but does not provide clear main points of the presentation. 1 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No introduction included. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Substantial content included that has use of accurate course concepts linking theory to the topic chosen and applying examples. Analyzes the topic from an management standpoint. 35 to >25.0 pts Excellent/Good Fulfills all/most criterion 25 to >15.0 pts Satisfactory/Needs Improvement Minimal content to summarize and explain the topic is included with moderate use of course concepts and examples. 15 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Content for the presentation is ineffective or missing or fails to meet the requirements of management concepts included. 35 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion Conclusion included linking the findings to the main questions addressed in the introduction. 5 to >3.0 pts Excellent/Good Fulfills all/most criterion 3 to >1.0 pts Satisfactory/Needs Improvement Conclusion included, but does not provide an adequate summary or is ineffective. 1 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No conclusion included. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization The presentation is well organized and develops a coherent point of view on the topic chosen. Presentation has been edited for flow of sentences, spelling and grammar with little to no errors. 15 to >10.0 pts Excellent/Good Fulfills all/most criterion 10 to >4.0 pts Satisfactory/Needs Improvement Presentation needs some structural revision so that it flows in a unified, coherent manner. Presentation has not been edited adequately for flow of sentences, spelling and grammar errors. 4 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Presentation is organized such that the ideas are incoherent. Presentation fails to meet college-level grammar, spelling and format use. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Citations Expert sources with a minimum of 3 sources included are utilized to establish the content of the paper with excellent use of in-text citations as needed for quotes, statistics or facts provided or information that is directly from the reference. Reference page is completed correctly according to APA standards. 10 to >7.0 pts Excellent/Good Fulfills all/most criterion 7 to >3.0 pts Satisfactory/Needs Improvement Less than the minimum number of expert sources are utilized with poor use of in-text citations as needed for quotes, statistics or facts provided or information that is directly from the reference. Reference page is somewhat completed according to APA standards. 3 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory None to few sources utilized. Many in-text citations and/or Reference entries are missing or seriously deviate from citation guidelines. 10 pts Total Points: 70 PreviousNext